Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: st: stcox continuous interaction issue stata 10
From
Nick Cox <[email protected]>
To
[email protected]
Subject
Re: st: stcox continuous interaction issue stata 10
Date
Mon, 21 Mar 2011 09:14:14 +0000
In addition, you could do it as a special case of -anova-.
Nick
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 8:09 AM, Maarten buis <[email protected]> wrote:
> --- On Mon, 21/3/11, Matt Cooper wrote:
>> Just to confirm, prior to Stata11 there was no way
>> to have an interaction variable created on the fly
>> in a regression equation
>
> That is correct for the continuous by continuous
> case, but -xi- could do this for the discrete by
> continous or discrete by discrete cases.
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/