Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
st: Re: Interpretation of xtmixed repeated measures
From
Janet Hill <[email protected]>
To
[email protected]
Subject
st: Re: Interpretation of xtmixed repeated measures
Date
Fri, 18 Mar 2011 12:50:04 +0000 (GMT)
I am trying to learn to use xtmixed for repeated measures designs. In the example from the Repeated Measures FAQ:
anova lhist group / dog|group time time#group if dog !=6,repeated(time)
There is a significant effect of group. However when I use:
xtmixed lhist group##time if dog !=6 || dog:
margins group##time, post asbalanced
| Delta-method
| Margin Std. Err. z P>|z| [95% Conf. Interval]
-------------+----------------------------------------------------------------
group |
1 | -2.093812 .3719332 -5.63 0.000 -2.822788 -1.364837
2 | -2.552977 .4294714 -5.94 0.000 -3.394725 -1.711228
3 | -.8932172 .3719332 -2.40 0.016 -1.622193 -.1642416
4 | -2.479522 .3719332 -6.67 0.000 -3.208498 -1.750546
|
etc.
I can compare individual groups but I cannot see how to get an 'overall' effect as in the anova.
I would be grateful for some advice on how to achieve this or a reference to a tutorial on xtmixed and margins.
Thanks,
Janet
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/