Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
From | Richard Murphy <r1ch4rd.murphy@gmail.com> |
To | statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu |
Subject | Re: st: Reshape with prefix using a varlist |
Date | Mon, 14 Mar 2011 17:45:18 -0700 |
Hi Nick , I appreciate that it looks foolish making a wide dataset even wider, but I don't think its that bad in this case. I have university by degree level by year data. For each of these i have the number of students coming from 244 different countries, along with total EU and total OS. year instit LEVEL os uk eu country1-country244 1994 1 ug 12 146 0 1994 1 pgr 3 335 3 1994 1 pgt 1 101 0 1995 1 ug 7 119 0 1995 1 pgr 4 300 9 1995 1 pgt 6 59 17 There are 3 levels of degree, which i would like to make wide. So that I would have a panel dataset for universities over time. The reason why i want to do this is that I want to calculate the cross subsidisation that occurs between the degree levels, and for this I need the totals for each within an observation. I need to do this for all the countries as i'm using a Card Shift-Share approach as an instrument for changes in overseas numbers, which i would like to define in various different ways throughout the analysis (EU, NonEU, Asia, ect). And i would like the prefix, so that the variable names fit into my pre existing do files for the analysis. Best regards Richard On 14 March 2011 17:24, Nick Cox <njcoxstata@gmail.com> wrote: > Please tell us directly more about your dataset and why you think > -reshape wide- is a good idea. From what you say it just make most > analyses more difficult. Also, how many variables will you end up > with? > > Nick > > On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 12:13 AM, Richard Murphy > <r1ch4rd.murphy@gmail.com> wrote: >> Hi all, >> I want to reshape long data to wide, putting the 'j' string variable >> at the begging of the stub. >> This would be fine if I have a limited number of variables as i can >> just use the @ function. >> reshape wide @var1 @var2 @var3 @var4, i(instit year) j(LEVEL) string >> >> But this does not work if i use the variable list functionality of >> reshape. I would like to know if their is an easier way of doing this, >> rather than typing in all 244 variables preceded by @. >> reshape wide @var1-@var244, i(instit year) j(LEVEL) string >> > * > * For searches and help try: > * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search > * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq > * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/ > * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/