Bookmark and Share

Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: st: Reshape with prefix using a varlist


From   Richard Murphy <[email protected]>
To   [email protected]
Subject   Re: st: Reshape with prefix using a varlist
Date   Mon, 14 Mar 2011 17:45:18 -0700

Hi Nick ,
I appreciate that it looks foolish making a wide dataset even wider,
but I don't think its that bad in this case.
I have university by degree level by year data. For each of these i
have the number of students coming from 244 different countries, along
with total EU and total OS.

year	instit	LEVEL	os	uk	eu country1-country244
1994	1	ug	        12	146	0
1994	1	pgr     	3	335	3
1994	1	pgt    	1	101	0
1995	1	ug	        7	119	0
1995	1	pgr     	4	300	9
1995	1	pgt	        6	59	17

There are 3 levels of degree, which i would like to make wide. So that
I would have a panel dataset for universities over time. The reason
why i want to do this is that I want to calculate the cross
subsidisation that occurs between the degree levels, and for this I
need the totals for each within an observation.

I need to do this for all the countries as i'm using a Card
Shift-Share approach as an instrument for changes in overseas numbers,
which i would like to define in various different ways throughout the
analysis (EU, NonEU, Asia, ect).

And i would like the prefix, so that the variable names fit into my
pre existing do files for the analysis.

Best regards
Richard


On 14 March 2011 17:24, Nick Cox <[email protected]> wrote:
> Please tell us directly more about your dataset and why you think
> -reshape wide- is a good idea. From what you say it just make most
> analyses more difficult. Also, how many variables will you end up
> with?
>
> Nick
>
> On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 12:13 AM, Richard Murphy
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Hi all,
>> I want to reshape long data to wide, putting the 'j' string variable
>> at the begging of the stub.
>> This would be fine if I have a limited number of variables as i can
>> just use the @ function.
>> reshape wide @var1 @var2 @var3 @var4, i(instit year) j(LEVEL) string
>>
>> But this does not work if i use the variable list functionality of
>> reshape. I would like to know if their is an easier way of doing this,
>> rather than typing in all 244 variables preceded by @.
>> reshape wide @var1-@var244, i(instit year) j(LEVEL) string
>>
> *
> *   For searches and help try:
> *   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
> *   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
> *   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
>

*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/


© Copyright 1996–2018 StataCorp LLC   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   Site index