Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
st: sureg problem - comparison with nlsur
From
Alex Olssen <[email protected]>
To
[email protected]
Subject
st: sureg problem - comparison with nlsur
Date
Thu, 10 Mar 2011 14:21:05 +1300
As a follow up to my last post I would like to further highlight the
problem by making a comparison between -sureg- and -nlsur-
Again I use examples from auto.dta
sysuse auto, clear
sureg (weight length = mpg)
nlsur (weight = {a0} + {a1}*mpg) (length = {b0} + {b1}*mpg)
A comparison shows that -nlsur- and -sur- produce the same results
when given the same linear model.
But now consider
sysuse auto, clear
sureg (weight length = mpg price)
nlsur (weight = {a0} + {a1}*mpg + {a2}*price) (length = {b0} +
{b1}*mpg + {b2}*price)
The two models are identical. Stata estimates the first model but
complains about a singular covariance matrix for the second model.
Is this correct? Can anybody please give suggestions as to what is
happening here?
Kind regards,
Alex Olssen
Motu Economic Research
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/