Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
From | "Andreas Drichoutis" <adrihout@cc.uoi.gr> |
To | <statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu> |
Subject | RE: st: joint hypothesis test with one sided alternatives |
Date | Wed, 9 Mar 2011 19:32:36 +0200 |
Thanks for the reply. test does not allow to test inequalities i.e., it only displays two-sided tests. Any other solutions? -----Original Message----- From: owner-statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu [mailto:owner-statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu] On Behalf Of Muyang Zhang Sent: Wednesday, March 09, 2011 7:24 PM To: statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu Subject: Re: st: joint hypothesis test with one sided alternatives They are not equivalent. You can simply use -test- with multiple equations/inequalities. 2011/3/9 Andreas Drichoutis <adrihout@cc.uoi.gr>: > Dear all, > > I estimate an interval regression model of the form Y=_cons+a1*X1+a2*X2 . > > How would I run a joint hypothesis test with one sided alternatives e.g. > that a1>0 & a2<0. > > Is this equivalent to testing a1*a2<0 ? Is it valid to use?: > testnl _b[a1]*_b[a2]=0 > local sign_test=sign(_b[a1]*_b[a2]) > di _b[a1]*_b[a2] " H0: coef<0 p-value= " > 1-normal(`sign_test'*sqrt(r(chi2))) > > > Best, > Andreas Drichoutis > > > > * > * For searches and help try: > * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search > * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq > * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/ > -- Zhang Muyang China Center for Economic Research Peking University Beijing, 100871 China. * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/ * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/