Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
From | Jörg Eulenberger <j.eulenberger@web.de> |
To | statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu |
Subject | Re: st: R: compare survivor functions |
Date | Wed, 09 Mar 2011 15:08:15 +0100 |
Thanks a lot, Jörg Am 08.03.2011 15:17, schrieb Carlo Lazzaro: > A temptative answer would consider to perform 6 pairwise comparisons (i.e.: > Group 1 vs Group 2; Group 1 vs Group 3; Group 1 vs Group 4; Group 2 vs Group > 3; Group 2 vs Group 4; Group 3 vs Group 4)with, for example, a Log-rank test > (or whatever is appropriate with your data) and multiplying by 6 (the number > of the pairwise comparisons) the p-value obtained in each pairwise > comparison. > This procedure should shed light on which Group(s) actually lead(s) the > significance of the overall test groups that you performed. > > HTH and Kindest Regards, > Carlo > -----Messaggio originale----- > Da: owner-statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu > [mailto:owner-statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu] Per conto di Jörg Eulenberger > Inviato: martedì 8 marzo 2011 14.57 > A: 'statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu' > Oggetto: st: compare survivor functions > > > Dear Statalisters, > I have 4 Groups (migrants) with disproportional survival functions. The > Peto-Peto test for equality of survivor functions is significant (sts > test groups, peto trend) . How can I do multiple group comparisons (like > scheffe after oneway) of the survival functions ? Is it possible? > > Thanks, > Jörg > > > > > * > * For searches and help try: > * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search > * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq > * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/ > > > > * > * For searches and help try: > * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search > * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq > * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/ > * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/