Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: st: Using -estout- with multiply-imputed data: how to report r2 and r2_a
From 
 
"Nic" <[email protected]> 
To 
 
<[email protected]> 
Subject 
 
Re: st: Using -estout- with multiply-imputed data: how to report r2 and r2_a 
Date 
 
Tue, 8 Mar 2011 10:27:58 -0500 
Yulia, thanks for your very helpful reply. And thanks also for emailing me 
the modified mibeta.ado.
I am now able to use the -estout- package with -mibeta- and produce tables 
with r2 and r2_a summary statistics. Perfect!
You mentioned as a side note in your reply to use caution with the -post- 
option. In particular, you mention that the (correctly computed) p-values 
reported by -mi estimate- (and thus your wrapper, -mibeta-) may not 
correspond to the results presented when creating a table with the -estout- 
package. Or in other words, if I understand correctly, -estout- likely 
computes p-values using incorrect (not coefficient-specific) degrees of 
freedom. The result will be tables that have incorrectly reported 
statistical significance.
So if I understand correctly, it sounds like -mi estimate- and -estout- 
independently compute p-values. Is this correct? I was under the impression 
that -estout- was just using the p-values already computed by -mi estimate-. 
It sounds like I should not be using -estout- to report p-values for 
multiply-imputed data.
Thanks again. 
*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/