Bookmark and Share

Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: st: Using -estout- with multiply-imputed data: how to report r2 and r2_a


From   "Nic" <[email protected]>
To   <[email protected]>
Subject   Re: st: Using -estout- with multiply-imputed data: how to report r2 and r2_a
Date   Tue, 8 Mar 2011 10:27:58 -0500

Yulia, thanks for your very helpful reply. And thanks also for emailing me the modified mibeta.ado.

I am now able to use the -estout- package with -mibeta- and produce tables with r2 and r2_a summary statistics. Perfect!

You mentioned as a side note in your reply to use caution with the -post- option. In particular, you mention that the (correctly computed) p-values reported by -mi estimate- (and thus your wrapper, -mibeta-) may not correspond to the results presented when creating a table with the -estout- package. Or in other words, if I understand correctly, -estout- likely computes p-values using incorrect (not coefficient-specific) degrees of freedom. The result will be tables that have incorrectly reported statistical significance.

So if I understand correctly, it sounds like -mi estimate- and -estout- independently compute p-values. Is this correct? I was under the impression that -estout- was just using the p-values already computed by -mi estimate-. It sounds like I should not be using -estout- to report p-values for multiply-imputed data.

Thanks again.
*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/


© Copyright 1996–2018 StataCorp LLC   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   Site index