Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: st: Using -estout- with multiply-imputed data: how to report r2 and r2_a
From
"Nic" <[email protected]>
To
<[email protected]>
Subject
Re: st: Using -estout- with multiply-imputed data: how to report r2 and r2_a
Date
Tue, 8 Mar 2011 10:27:58 -0500
Yulia, thanks for your very helpful reply. And thanks also for emailing me
the modified mibeta.ado.
I am now able to use the -estout- package with -mibeta- and produce tables
with r2 and r2_a summary statistics. Perfect!
You mentioned as a side note in your reply to use caution with the -post-
option. In particular, you mention that the (correctly computed) p-values
reported by -mi estimate- (and thus your wrapper, -mibeta-) may not
correspond to the results presented when creating a table with the -estout-
package. Or in other words, if I understand correctly, -estout- likely
computes p-values using incorrect (not coefficient-specific) degrees of
freedom. The result will be tables that have incorrectly reported
statistical significance.
So if I understand correctly, it sounds like -mi estimate- and -estout-
independently compute p-values. Is this correct? I was under the impression
that -estout- was just using the p-values already computed by -mi estimate-.
It sounds like I should not be using -estout- to report p-values for
multiply-imputed data.
Thanks again.
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/