Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: st:the disadvantage of using -xi- to create indicators for categorical variables
From
Steven Samuels <[email protected]>
To
[email protected]
Subject
Re: st:the disadvantage of using -xi- to create indicators for categorical variables
Date
Fri, 17 Dec 2010 11:18:20 -0500
-
That default behavior can be changed. See "Summary of controlling the
omitted dummy" in the -help- for -xi-. But factor variables offer
many more options for choosing the reference category.
Steve
[email protected]
On Dec 17, 2010, at 2:43 AM, Laura R. wrote:
As far as I know, with -xi- the reference category is chosen
automatically, wich might be a disadvantage.
Laura
2010/12/17 Maarten buis <[email protected]>:
--- On Thu, 16/12/10, Amanda Fu wrote:
I am curious: can some one here share how you decide to
decide to use -xi- or not to run a regression with lot
of categorical variables interactions?
I only used -xi- for a preliminary analysis when I was in
a hurry. Otherwise I prefered to create my own dummies
and interactions. Now I am slowly warming to Stata's new
factor variable notation, see: -help factor variable-,
and I see no use for -xi- at all.
--maarten
--------------------------
Maarten L. Buis
Institut fuer Soziologie
Universitaet Tuebingen
Wilhelmstrasse 36
72074 Tuebingen
Germany
http://www.maartenbuis.nl
--------------------------
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/