Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: st: outliers v. skew
From
Nick Cox <[email protected]>
To
"'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>
Subject
RE: st: outliers v. skew
Date
Tue, 30 Nov 2010 17:16:39 +0000
Personally, I agree with Neil here.
Nick
[email protected]
Neil Shephard
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 5:02 PM, Campo, Marc <[email protected]> wrote:
> Yes it is the same post. And yes.the answers were good there and appreciated. I don't know if it is poor form to move the post here. I was not at all unhappy with the answers. I had however, already run quantile regression so I was seeking additional opinions here.
>
It's perhaps sensible (to my mind at least) to reference it and
indicate that the suggestions have been tried.
That way others can see what has been done and avoid wasting time
suggesting something has already been suggested and tried.
After all, people on both lists give their valuable and limited time
freely. Failing to recognise this and attempting to minimise
duplication of efforts is a bit inconsiderate (again in my opinion).
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/