Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: st: xtlogit and clustering
From
Shehzad Ali <[email protected]>
To
[email protected]
Subject
Re: st: xtlogit and clustering
Date
Sun, 28 Nov 2010 19:37:13 +0000 (GMT)
Thanks, Jeph. I was trying to use a generic example but I realise it wasnt the
best example. So I apologise for this.
Actually, this is a pooled data analysis using two separate trials. The studies
were pretty similar to each other in terms of how they were conducted, who was
recruited and how the outcome was measured. However, I am wondering if the study
identifier should be included as a covariate or as a cluster variable in the
analysis. If later, what would be the best way of doing that in Stata? The third
option is to assume this to be one large study, especially if the study
identifier variable is not significant in the model.
Individuals were measured at multiple timepoints, so the panel variable was
-id-.
Again, apologies for using the wrong example earlier.
Many thanks,
Shehzad
----- Original Message ----
> From: Jeph Herrin <[email protected]>
> To: [email protected]
> Sent: Sun, 28 November, 2010 16:40:52
> Subject: Re: st: xtlogit and clustering
>
> With only 2 schools you will certainly run into trouble trying model
> variance between schools.
>
> More generally, you can estimate 3-level logit models with -xtmelogit-.
>
> hth,
> Jeph
>
>
> On 11/27/2010 9:29 AM, Shehzad Ali wrote:
> > Thanks, Maarten. That sounds like a good idea.
> >
> > The option I was wondering may be:
> >
> > gllamm y x1 x2, link(logit) fam(bin) i(school id)
> >
> > Here obviously the id (the student id) is the panel variable and school is
>the
> > higher level cluster variable. I wonder if this would be a wise option or
>should
> > I stick to what you suggested? Also, following on from your advice, the
>school
> > variable was not statistically significant when introduced as a covariate.
>Is
> > this an indication that I shouldn't worry about the school level
clustering?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Shehzad
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message ----
> >> From: Maarten buis<[email protected]>
> >> To: [email protected]
> >> Sent: Fri, 26 November, 2010 15:56:38
> >> Subject: Re: st: xtlogit and clustering
> >>
> >> --- On Fri, 26/11/10, Shehzad Ali wrote:
> >>> If you have clustered data from two schools with repeated
> >>> observations for students at three time points. Is it
> >>> possible to use the -xtlogit- model and specify that
> >>> clustering occurs at the level of students (the panel
> >>> data) and also at the level of schools (two schools)?
> >>
> >> Why not just include a dummy for school? Two clusters
> >> seems to me way too few for anything more sophisticated.
> >>
> >> Hope this helps,
> >> Maarten
> >>
> >> --------------------------
> >> Maarten L. Buis
> >> Institut fuer Soziologie
> >> Universitaet Tuebingen
> >> Wilhelmstrasse 36
> >> 72074 Tuebingen
> >> Germany
> >>
> >> http://www.maartenbuis.nl
> >> --------------------------
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> *
> >> * For searches and help try:
> >> * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
> >> * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
> >> * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > *
> > * For searches and help try:
> > * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
> > * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
> > * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
> >
> *
> * For searches and help try:
> * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
> * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
> * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
>
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/