Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: st: RE: scalar do not allow -if-
From
Nick Cox <[email protected]>
To
"'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>
Subject
RE: st: RE: scalar do not allow -if-
Date
Wed, 17 Nov 2010 20:39:22 +0000
Yes and no; the code is good, but the commentary could be misleading.
You can certainly use -cond()- to define these scalars, as others have already pointed out in this thread.
But its role is not analogous to that of the -if- qualifier. -if- qualifiers apply conditionally to a subset of observations (which may be empty or the whole set), but no such notion applies to scalars.
Nick
[email protected]
Sergiy Radyakin
the scalar version of -if- is cond():
scalar hig = cond(w2>w1,cond(w3>w2,3,2),cond(w3>w1,3,1))
although if in your example you had w1,w2,...w100, you wouldn't want
to write anything like the above.
you would then program one -forvalues- loop and one -if- branch that
updates the index of the max element.
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 11:11 AM, Nick Cox <[email protected]> wrote:
> A command
>
> ... if <condition>
>
> applies observation by observation and can not be what you want.
>
> I guess that you want
>
> if (w1 > w2) & (w1 > w3) {
> scalar hig = 1
> }
> else if (w2 > w1) & (w2 > w3) {
> scalar hig = 2
> }
> else if (w3 > w1) & (w3 > w2) {
> scalar hig = 3
> }
>
> These sound like "w1 biggest", "w2 biggest", "w3 biggest". If there are any ties w1 == w2 | w2 == w3 your scalar will be undefined. (I've corrected what looks like a typo in your code, but not this problem with ties, which is perhaps unlikely.)
Tomas Lind
> In a small simulation I generate data and analyze them with 3 regression methods. In the bottom of the loop I save (among other things)
>
> scalar b2 = exp(_b[x]) // beta
>
> and then put the -scalar- values into a variable in a dataset where I collect the results from the 1000 simulated datasets. For example
>
> quietly replace b2=scalar(b1) in `i'
>
>
> That works fine. Now I want to calculate "hig" (in the bottom of the loop) and save it in the dataset with aggregated data (where w1, w2, w3 are -scalars-).
>
> scalar hig = 1 if (w1 > w2) & (w1 > w3)
> scalar hig = 2 if (w2 > w1) & (w2 > w3)
> scalar hig = 3 if (w3 > w1) & (w3 > w1)
>
> However, -if- is not allowed in combination with -scalar-.
>
>
> *
> * For searches and help try:
> * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
> * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
> * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
>
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/