Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: st: OT: how to report statistics in (medical) journals
From
"Seed, Paul" <[email protected]>
To
"[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject
RE: st: OT: how to report statistics in (medical) journals
Date
Wed, 17 Nov 2010 14:50:35 +0000
- --- On Tue, 16/11/10, Kaulisch, Marc wrote:
> I was asked to provide some tests for analyses in an
> article for a medical journal. <snip> Are there any
> guidelines for reporting statistics?
Nick Cox & Maarten Buis both suggest Marc looks at the
journal's practice & policy. This is fine as far as it gues, but current
practice is not always best practice. (Altman DG (2002) Poor Quality
Medical Research. What Can Journals Do? JAMA 287 2765-2767 )
There are a number of guidelines for reporting clinical studies
(CONSORT - randomised comtrolled trials, STARD - diagnostic
tests, PRISMA - meta-analyses) and others.
Marc should google these.
(Altman DG, Schulz KF, Moher D, Egger M, Davidoff F, Elbourne D,
Getzsche PC & Lang T (2001). The revised CONSORT statement
for reporting randomized trials: explanation and elaboration. Annals of
Internal Medicine 134:663-694.)
These stress producing estimates with confidence intervals as well as
(and in preference to) p-values. Rank-based tests such as
Wilcoxon & Kruskal-Wallis are unhelpful in that
they give no such estimates. If Marc has the time, he may investigate
the possibility of parametric tests, posibly after log-transformation, or
dropping outliers, so that he can report meaningful estimates with
confidence intervals.
BW
Paul Seed
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/