Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
st: RE: RE: RE: effect size in nonlinear regression
From
"Airey, David C" <[email protected]>
To
"[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject
st: RE: RE: RE: effect size in nonlinear regression
Date
Tue, 16 Nov 2010 12:24:02 -0600
.
I agree about the graphs. Good point on the awkward choice of parameter symbols! :)
I'll just choose reasonable constant spread and differing parameter values and look at resulting power.
> Very small but possibly not minor detail: it depends on your audience, but e as a parameter suggests to many exp(1) ~ 2.71828, so that some other symbol may be advisable.
>
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/