Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: st: Fwd: gllamm and relative risk
From
Stas Kolenikov <[email protected]>
To
[email protected]
Subject
Re: st: Fwd: gllamm and relative risk
Date
Sun, 14 Nov 2010 22:39:56 -0600
-gllamm- does not care what the link function is. Check your syntax
and your variables; for the syntax below to work, you need to have
variables -weight1- and -weight2- containing the weights at level 1
(observations) and level 2 (individuals), respectively.
On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 7:07 PM, Hillel Alpert <[email protected]> wrote:
> As a follow-up to this question, I understand now that the link(log) function provides the risk ratios. However, the gllamm command does not accept pweights with this link function. Can anyone advise how probability weights could be incorporated into such an analysis?
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Could someone advise please, does GLLAMM provide relative risk ratios as output?
> With the following command, for example, the exponentiated output is given. Is it the odds ratio, and if so, what is the syntax for relative risk ratio?
>
> gllamm depvar var1-var6, i(id) family(binomial) link(logit) pweight(weight) nip(8) adapt eform
--
Stas Kolenikov, also found at http://stas.kolenikov.name
Small print: I use this email account for mailing lists only.
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/