Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: st: RE: Knowing how a variable was generated
From
Louis Boakye-Yiadom <[email protected]>
To
[email protected]
Subject
RE: st: RE: Knowing how a variable was generated
Date
Sun, 31 Oct 2010 17:41:17 +0000 (GMT)
That's correct. I'm looking at a situation where the do-file is not available. Indeed, often you may have to work with a dataset for which you played no role in the generation of the variables. Thanks.
Louis
--- On Sun, 31/10/10, Nick Cox <[email protected]> wrote:
> Indeed. But Louis' question, and my
> answers, presuppose that was not done.
>
> Nick
> [email protected]
>
>
> Michael McCulloch
>
> Wouldn't it be sufficient to simple record the work in a
> do-file that documents the command:
> gen B = (A*C) + D, or
> gen B = A*(C + D)?
>
> On Oct 31, 2010, at 9:46 AM, Nick Cox wrote:
>
> > There are programs that enable users to record
> definitions of variables as they generate or replace them.
> See e.g. -labgen- from SSC and especially its references.
> >
> > More generally, if users employed variable labels or
> characteristics to record the definition of variables --
> then your problem is indeed soluble.
> >
> > I didn't imagine that's what you had in mind, as if
> you knew that definitions were stored that way it's hard to
> see why your question arises.
>
> Louis Boakye-Yiadom
>
> Nick, thanks for the reply. I was thinking that if it's
> possible for Stata to store information on the generation of
> the variable (at least in simple cases), it might be
> possible to have this feature in Stata.
>
> Nick Cox
>
> >> In general, no. How could there be?
> >>
> >> However, in simple cases for Y calculated somehow
> from X,
> >> looking at graphs of Y vs X might give a
> clue.
>
> Louis Boakye-Yiadom
>
> >> If some of the variables in a dataset were
> generated by a
> >> transformation or combination of some other
> variable(s) in
> >> the data, is it possible to know this without
> seeing the
> >> relevant log or do file? For example, consider a
> situation
> >> where the variables in the data include A, B, C,
> and D, and
> >> B was generated as follows:
> >> B = A*C + D
> >> Is there a command for determining how B was
> generated?
>
> *
> * For searches and help try:
> * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
> * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
> * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
>
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/