Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
AW: AW: st: Testing for differences
From
"Marc Michelsen" <[email protected]>
To
<[email protected]>
Subject
AW: AW: st: Testing for differences
Date
Fri, 29 Oct 2010 09:41:01 +0200
Right, that makes totally sense. Accordingly. I would regress each firm characteristic (leverage, profitability) separately. Is this correct?
Thanks for this.
Marc
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] Im Auftrag von Maarten buis
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 28. Oktober 2010 17:41
An: [email protected]
Betreff: Re: AW: st: Testing for differences
--- On Thu, 28/10/10, Marc Michelsen wrote:
> thanks for this. Would that be a multinomial logistic
> regression as the rating outlook has the three values
> "positive, negative, stable"?
No, the rating and the outlook are both explanatory/
independent/predictor/right-hand-side/x-variables.
The characteristic (whatever that may be) is your
explained/dependent/left-hand-side/y-variable. So
the type of regression depends on the type of
firm characteristic you want to investigate.
Hope this helps,
Maarten
--------------------------
Maarten L. Buis
Institut fuer Soziologie
Universitaet Tuebingen
Wilhelmstrasse 36
72074 Tuebingen
Germany
http://www.maartenbuis.nl
--------------------------
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/