Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
From | Maarten buis <maartenbuis@yahoo.co.uk> |
To | statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu |
Subject | RE: st: Interaction in logit |
Date | Wed, 27 Oct 2010 08:26:53 +0100 (BST) |
--- On Wed, 27/10/10, Teemu.Kautonen@tse.fi wrote: > Would it be appropriate to keep all interaction terms in > the model at the same time, or would you recommend testing > the interactions separately, i.e. keeping only one > interaction term in the model when running inteff? Or would > a completely different strategy be better for testing > multiple group differences - something like a random > coefficient model? In principle there is nothing wrong with any of these models as long as they are appropriate for the specific situation you are researching, your theory, your data, etc., etc. So there realy is only one person that can answer that question, and that is the researcher. Hope this helps, Maarten -------------------------- Maarten L. Buis Institut fuer Soziologie Universitaet Tuebingen Wilhelmstrasse 36 72074 Tuebingen Germany http://www.maartenbuis.nl -------------------------- * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/