Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: st: RE: non-constant Frequency weights
From
Steven Samuels <[email protected]>
To
[email protected]
Subject
Re: st: RE: non-constant Frequency weights
Date
Tue, 26 Oct 2010 16:56:34 -0400
--
Thanks, Stephen.
To answer your question: If the panels is based ona sample of the
population in the first year, then use that first year weight. If the
panel is a rotating panel, with individuals entering in different
years, than for those individuals, use the weight for their first
year. The weights in different years are useful for presenting cross-
sectional statistics for each of the years, but not for the panel
analysis.
Also, the weights should not be specified as probability weights, not
frequency weights. A frequency weight equal to K, say, is intended
for use when there are K individuals in the _sample_ with identical
values. If you tell a commandthat the weights are frequency weight,
then you are saying that the sample size is equal to the population
size.
Regards,
Steve
Steven J. Samuels
[email protected]
18 Cantine's Island
Saugerties NY 12477
USA
Voice: 845-246-0774
Fax: 206-202-4783
On Oct 26, 2010, at 4:34 PM, Stephen O Neill wrote:
Hi Steve,
My data is from a survey which contains weights representing the
number of
inidividuals in the population represented by each sample observation.
However
in differnt years this frequency weight is different i.e. the number of
population individuals the sample observation represents changes from
year to
year.
Hope this clarifies,
Stephen
----- Original Message ----
From: Steven Samuels <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Tue, October 26, 2010 7:40:47 PM
Subject: Re: st: RE: non-constant Frequency weights
Stephen O Neill:
Off-topic, but I'm curious: How can you have repeated identical
observations on
one individual at a single time point, which is what a frequency
weight>1 would
imply?
Steve
[email protected]
On Oct 26, 2010, at 2:28 PM, Nick Cox wrote:
Fair enough. Now you have a specific question, to which I don't know
the answer;
but someone else may have specific advice.
Nick
[email protected]
Stephen O Neill
When I try to run - xtreg,fe - I get the error message "weight must be
constant
within ID", where ID is my unique identifier for each individual and
is constant
for an individual over time. I also wanteed to use the user written -
xtabond2 -
or some other dynamic model but it appears that weights can't be used
with
these.
Nick Cox <[email protected]>
I don't see the connections between these statements. A variable
containing
frequency weights can vary between observations, in this instance
within panels
as well as between panels, so that is not a problem in itself.
Perhaps some particular procedures have more restricted assumptions,
but you
don't say what they are.
Stephen O Neill
I am using unbalanced panel data which contains a frequency weight
each year.
However the weight is not constant through time with the result that I
cannot
weight the data using - [fweight = weight] - . I was just wondering if
there is
a simple work around?
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/