Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
st: RE: RE: par ambiguous abbreviation error in qic
From
"Daegyu Yang" <[email protected]>
To
<[email protected]>
Subject
st: RE: RE: par ambiguous abbreviation error in qic
Date
Wed, 13 Oct 2010 01:07:46 -1000
Hi Nick:
Thank you so much! Renaming variables beginning w/ "par*" was the very solution. I really appreciate your kind explanation!
As you recommend, I also tried to send a mail to the author of the qic command first, but the mail was immediately returned due to the unknown address by the server. So I had to ask here. Very happy to get the answer this soon. :D
Best regards,
Daegyu
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Nick Cox
Sent: Wednesday, October 13, 2010 12:54 AM
To: '[email protected]'
Cc: '[email protected]'
Subject: st: RE: par ambiguous abbreviation error in qic
-qic- is user-written. Please remember to explain where you got user-written programs you refer to.
SJ-8-1 st0126_1 . . . . . . QIC program and model selection in GEE analyses
(help qic if installed) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . J. Cui
Q1/08 SJ 8(1):146
general negative binomial distribution now included with qic
SJ-7-2 st0126 . . . . . . . QIC program and model selection in GEE analyses
(help qic if installed) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . J. Cui
Q2/07 SJ 7(2):209--220
provides the quasilikelihood under the independence
model criterion (QIC) method for GEE model selection
-qic- estimates a scalar -par-. If you have a variable -par- as well, or one that abbreviates to -par-, there will be a problem. See
SJ-6-2 dm0021 . Stata tip 31: Scalar or variable? Problem of ambiguous names
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . G. I. Kolev
Q2/06 SJ 6(2):279--280 (no commands)
tips for avoiding abbreviation conflicts with variables
when naming scalars
and the references it cites for more on this problem. (This paper is accessible online to you, regardless of whether you subscribe to the Stata Journal.)
Thus look to see if you have variables of that kind.
. d par*
will tell you. If you have, -rename- such variables as a quick work-around. If that is not the problem, tell us more.
Nick
[email protected]
Daegyu Yang
I tried to use qic in order to know the best correlation structure in my analysis, but the "par ambiguous abbreviation r(111)" error kept occurring. I don't know why. In the statalist, I found that someone had the same problem in 2007 as I do now, but it seems that that person didn't get the solution. Please let me know how to solve this problem or at least why this kind of error keeps occurring.
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/