Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: st: interesting reference
From
Robert A Yaffee <[email protected]>
To
[email protected]
Subject
Re: st: interesting reference
Date
Fri, 01 Oct 2010 06:01:28 -0400
Stas,
Are we going to replace Brownian motion with incremental entropic drift?
Cheers,
Bob
Robert A. Yaffee, Ph.D.
Research Professor
Silver School of Social Work
New York University
Biosketch: http://homepages.nyu.edu/~ray1/Biosketch2009.pdf
CV: http://homepages.nyu.edu/~ray1/vita.pdf
----- Original Message -----
From: Stas Kolenikov <[email protected]>
Date: Thursday, September 30, 2010 10:58 pm
Subject: Re: st: interesting reference
To: [email protected]
> On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 2:10 PM, Austin Nichols
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Stas--
> > I love this rant!
> > Now, what if a crazy Russian says everyone must use entropic inference
> > from now on?
> >
> > ps. how do you feel about the bus vs. the train?
>
> I bike to work in Columbia, MO. I probably would bike in DC, too...
> although I would have some reservations on a day like this :)). (For
> the record, I made Austin take the train.)
>
> But we are too far off the original track that I was interested in.
> Any additional comments on my question about -confirm-ations and
> -assert-ions?
>
> --
> Stas Kolenikov, also found at http://stas.kolenikov.name
> Small print: I use this email account for mailing lists only.
> *
> * For searches and help try:
> * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
> * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
> * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/