Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: st: Modeling % data
From
Austin Nichols <[email protected]>
To
[email protected]
Subject
Re: st: Modeling % data
Date
Wed, 22 Sep 2010 12:09:12 -0400
Maarten--
I don't see how data approaching the boundaries is a problem in
-qreg-, as long as the fraction at the boundary itself is not too
large (though that in itself is more an indictment of the outcome
measure than a necessary problem for quantile regression). If 10% of
the outcomes are at the lower boundary (zero) for low X and 10% of the
outcomes are at the upper boundary (100) for high X, how is that a
problem for estimating how the conditional median changes with X?
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 11:51 AM, Maarten buis <[email protected]> wrote:
> --- On Sep 22, 2010, at 8:03 AM, Marlis Gonzalez Fernandez wrote:
>> My outcome variable is a % (% error in a language test). We do have
>> many 0 and 100. I need to be able to do a multiple regression to
>> adjust for known predictors of the variable vs. the predictors of
>> interest.
>>
>> It was suggested that I use qreg. I've done so and it seems to
>> work.
>
> This all depends on how close your dependent variable gets to the boundaries of 0% and 100%. If the data stays well within the range of
> 20%-80% than I would have no problem using either -qreg- or just regular
> -reg-. However, when you have observations that get close to these
> boundaries, you'll probably want to take them into account. For that
> there is a whole suite of commands available, which I discussed at the
> last German Stata Users' Group meeting:
> <http://ideas.repec.org/p/boc/dsug10/04.html>
>
> (You'd have to look at your variable as an proportion rather than a
> percentage. But that is trivial, just divide by 100.)
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/