Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
From | "Martin Weiss" <martin.weiss1@gmx.de> |
To | <statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu> |
Subject | st: RE: RE: RE: estimate precision in MATA |
Date | Wed, 22 Sep 2010 09:29:30 +0200 |
<> Ok, but this is a very peculiar notion of precision ("display precision"). -format- does nothing to the underlying value that Stata sees, it simply changes your view onto the data when you display them. HTH Martin -----Original Message----- From: owner-statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu [mailto:owner-statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu] On Behalf Of Marie-Claire Robitaille-Blanchet Sent: Mittwoch, 22. September 2010 09:26 To: statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu Subject: st: RE: RE: estimate precision in MATA Hi Martin, Thanks for taking time to answer. Let say I want to sum two variables. I can use format to increase the number of digits after the decimal point for the new variable = old_variable_1 + old_variable_2. I'm looking for the equivalent but when I sum matrixes in MATA. So I want to increase the number of digit after the decimal point for the new matrix I'm creating from already existing matrixes. And, if possible, I would prefer the entry in the new matrix to be in the data type: double. Hope my question makes more sense now! Marie-claire -----Original Message----- From: owner-statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu [mailto:owner-statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu] On Behalf Of Martin Weiss Sent: Wednesday, 22 September 2010 3:11 PM To: statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu Subject: st: RE: estimate precision in MATA <> Just to be sure, Marie, how does the -format- command increase precision? Maybe you really meant to say "data type", as in -help data_types-? HTH Martin -----Original Message----- From: owner-statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu [mailto:owner-statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu] On Behalf Of Marie-Claire Robitaille-Blanchet Sent: Mittwoch, 22. September 2010 09:04 To: statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu Subject: st: estimate precision in MATA Dear all, I would like to increase the estimate precision in MATA. So I'm basically looking for the MATA equivalent of the "format" command in Stata. Which command should I use? Thanks in advance, Marie-Claire * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/ * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/ * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/ * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/