Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
st: Statistical significance when bootstrapping the -rd- command?
From
Jen Zhen <[email protected]>
To
[email protected]
Subject
st: Statistical significance when bootstrapping the -rd- command?
Date
Mon, 20 Sep 2010 16:20:47 +0200
Dear listers,
When bootstrapping Austin Nichol's rd command:
bs, reps(100): rd outcome assignment, mbw(100) ,
I find that often the resulting P value tells me the estimate is not
statistically significant at the conventional levels, even when visual
inspection and more basic methods like simple OLS regressions on a
treatment dummy, assignment and assignment squared suggest huge
statistical significance.
That makes me wonder whether possibly this boot-strapping method might
somehow understate the true statistical significance of the effect in
question? Or can and should I fully trust these results and conclude
that the estimate is not statistically significant at the conventional
levels?
Thanks and best regards,
JZ
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/