Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
<<winmail.dat>>
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
SV: mfx after pgmhaz8 [was: Re: st: Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2010 10:52:44 +0200]
From
"Anne Line Bretteville-Jensen" <[email protected]>
To
<[email protected]>
Subject
SV: mfx after pgmhaz8 [was: Re: st: Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2010 10:52:44 +0200]
Date
Fri, 17 Sep 2010 11:41:18 +0200
Thanks Maarten!
Anne
________________________________
Fra: [email protected] på vegne av Maarten buis
Sendt: fr 17.09.2010 11:32
Til: [email protected]
Emne: mfx after pgmhaz8 [was: Re: st: Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2010 10:52:44 +0200]
--- On Fri, 17/9/10, Anne Line Bretteville-Jensen wrote:
> I am running discrete time duration models with gamma
> frailty using the -pgmhaz8- command. I am trying to get the
> marginal effects too, but when I run the -mfx- command I
> only get the regression coefficients again and not the
> marginal effects. Do anyone know what I can do to get
> the correct marginal effects aften having run PGM hazard
> model with gamma frailty?
The usual effect sizes reported are the hazard ratios which
you will get when you add the -eform-. I don't think it is
possible to use -mfx- to get any other type of marginal
effect, as -pgmhaz8- does not contain a predict function.
Hope this helps,
Maarten
--------------------------
Maarten L. Buis
Institut fuer Soziologie
Universitaet Tuebingen
Wilhelmstrasse 36
72074 Tuebingen
Germany
http://www.maartenbuis.nl <http://www.maartenbuis.nl/>
--------------------------
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/