Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: st: simply start over and build something better
From
"Joseph Coveney" <[email protected]>
To
<[email protected]>
Subject
Re: st: simply start over and build something better
Date
Fri, 17 Sep 2010 03:27:16 +0900
Stas Kolenikov wrote:
Came randomly across a blog entry on R:
http://xianblog.wordpress.com/2010/09/13/simply-start-over-and-build-something-b
etter/
I wonder if Stata Corp. starts over and builds something better from
time to time. The two major rearrangements of the code that I am aware
of are the move towards Mata overt the last five or so years, and code
multi-threading for MP flavors. Stata does not seem to suffer from the
problems discussed in the above blog entry: the scope of everything is
well defined in both Stata and Mata, and Mata calls by reference
rather than by value (while Stata only deals with the data in memory
plus a small assortment of locals... at least insofar you don't touch
classes).
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The switch to the new graphics in Release 8 is about the closest thing to a
start-over-and-build-something-better event that I can recall.
Introduction of Mata seems more incremental. I'm sure that there are resource
constraints at play, too, but its seems primarily that StataCorp wants to take
its time with the development of Mata in order to make sure that they get it
right. About the only thing that I hope StataCorp will do in the near term is
to add two words to help m2_reswords: "interface" and "implements".
Joseph Coveney
P.S. I really like the new factor variables. Brilliant. I just wish that
StataCorp would provide more coaching about how users can implement them in
user-written modules.
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/