Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
st: Multiple imputation in panel data when subjects die
From
[email protected]
To
[email protected]
Subject
st: Multiple imputation in panel data when subjects die
Date
10 Sep 2010 11:45:58 +0100
Dear Statalist
I have a panel data set with some missing values which I would like to
impute using Stata's mi command. However, over time, subjects in my panel
die.
An example of the type of pattern I observe is:
Subject 1: M M M O O O D D D D D D
Subject 2: O O O O O M O O O O O D
Where M is 'missing', O is 'observed' and D is 'dead'.
In the exchange between Yulia Marchenko and Jibonayan Raychaudhuri
(http://www.stata.com/statalist/archive/2009-08/msg00388.html), Paul
Allison's (2001, page 74) approach to dealing with missing values in
longitudinal data is outlined, namely, if the data set is in "long" form,
reshape it to "wide" form so that there is one record for each subject
(with distinct variables for measurements on the imputation variable at
different points in time) and then perform the imputation, before reshaping
back to "long" form.
Because, over time, my subjects die, I have some missing values ("."s)
which need to be imputed, because they are "true missing values" (the "M"s
above), and also missing values which should not be imputed (the "D"s).
My proposed solution is to replace all missing values owing to the subject
having died (the "D"s) with another Stata coding for a missing value (e.g.
".a"), so that only the true missing values (the remaining "."s) are
imputed by mi.
Taking this approach, and using the reshaping approach suggested by Allison
and Yulia outlined above, Stata successfully imputes missing values for the
"."s and not the ".a"s, which I think is great.
My question is this: does my approach make sense, that is, does it
represent a "principled" approach to mi for panel data in the presence of
deaths, in the spirit of Allison (2001) and Yulia?
With thanks, in advance, for any help anyone can give me.
Martin Forster
REF: Allison, P. 2001, Missing Data. Sage University Papers Series on
Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences.
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/