Re: st: Re: FORTRAN

[Richard Williams <richardwilliams.ndu@gmail.com>]

At 03:38 PM 8/30/2010, Michael I. Lichter wrote:
> 1. I second Tony's advice that you don't want to take the time to 
> learn FORTRAN (an ancient and nearly-dead language that I last 
> programmed in nearly 30 (!) years ago) if you can avoid it. Hire 
> somebody to help if at all possible.
FORTRAN was old when the world was young.  Several billion people 
have been born and died since I last used it.  But according to 
Wikipedia, FORTRAN itself continues to thrive and prosper.  Among 
other things, Wikipedia says
"Since Fortran has been in use for more than fifty years, there is a 
vast body of Fortran in daily use throughout the scientific and 
engineering communities. It is the primary language for some of the 
most intensive supercomputing tasks, such as weather and climate 
modeling, computational fluid dynamics, computational chemistry, 
computational economics, plant breeding and computational physics. 
Even today, half a century later, many of the floating-point 
benchmarks to gauge the performance of new computer processors are 
still written in Fortran (e.g., CFP2006, the floating-point component 
of the SPEC CPU2006 benchmarks)."

-------------------------------------------
Richard Williams, Notre Dame Dept of Sociology
OFFICE: (574)631-6668, (574)631-6463
HOME:   (574)289-5227
EMAIL:  Richard.A.Williams.5@ND.Edu
WWW:    http://www.nd.edu/~rwilliam

*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/