Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
From | Narasimhan Sowmyanarayanan <narasimhan.sowmyanarayanan@gmail.com> |
To | statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu |
Subject | st: Question on panel data estimation |
Date | Sat, 28 Aug 2010 15:56:27 -0400 |
I am working on an unbalanced dynamic panel. I am trying to use the xtdpdsys command since I want to do the estimation in level and the robust option to get heteroskedasticity consistent estimator to serial correlation. First I used the one step estimator and the standard error from the robust option in the one step estimator is not too different from the original standard error without the whites correction. However, when I use the two step estimator, with the robust option, the standard errors drastically increase and all the significant effect that I obtained from the one step estimator with the robust standard error option disappear. For example the z value of a robust one step estimator is around 4 while the uncorrected two step estimator has a z-value of 100 and the Windmeijer corrected two step estimator (with the robust option) gets me a z value of 1. I want to understand if these wild swings are a nature of the data or is it something to do with the estimation. Some insights would be highly appreciated. Thanks in advance Narasimhan. * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/