Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: st: Discrete time hazard model-interval censored
From
Steve Samuels <[email protected]>
To
[email protected]
Subject
Re: st: Discrete time hazard model-interval censored
Date
Fri, 27 Aug 2010 13:37:13 -0400
--
With only one interval, a discrete hazard model is _not_ suitable.
Use a -logistic- (or -cloglog-) model instead.
Steve
Steven J. Samuels
[email protected]
18 Cantine's Island
Saugerties NY 12477
USA
Voice: 845-246-0774
Fax: 206-202-4783
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 1:26 PM, Nyasha Tirivayi <[email protected]> wrote:
> Dear All
>
> I have a dataset on labour force participation in an African country.
> There are two waves of interviews, January 2009 and August 2009. I am
> interested in looking at the effects of a social program on the
> transitions into employment. The survey asked questions like, "are you
> empoyed at the moment" . I am especially interested in those who at
> first interview had were not employed. However ,we do not know exactly
> the date when they do get employed, we only have a response at second
> interview whether they are employed or not.
>
> Could anyone advise me if a discrete time hazard model is suitable?
> What stata methods do I use for the interval censoring? And how do I
> correct for the selection bias of the social program?
>
> May you kindly advise
>
> Regards
>
> Nyasha Tirivayi
> PhD researcher
> Maastricht Graduate School of Governance
> Maastricht University
> Netherlands
> *
> * For searches and help try:
> * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
> * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
> * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
>
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/