Re: st: RE: nlsur and estout

[Thoms <tpt21@cam.ac.uk>]

your answer was very helpful. But only after I added the noeqlines 
option I realized that the problemis bigger.

As I explained below because of the way that the e(b) after nlsur is 
labelled esttab seems to believe there are two coefficients for every 
single coefficient.

Thanks,

Thomas

On 26/08/2010 16:50, Martin Weiss wrote:
> <>
>
> Anything wrong with yesterday`s answer?
> http://www.hsph.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/lwgate/STATALIST/archives/statalist.1008
> /Author/article-1254.html
>
>
>
> HTH
> Martin
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu
> [mailto:owner-statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu] On Behalf Of Thoms
> Sent: Donnerstag, 26. August 2010 16:40
> To: statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu
> Subject: st: nlsur and estout
>
> I am trying to use esttab after nlsur.
>
> nlsure outputs an e(b) matrix that looks like this:
>
> e(b)[1,21]
> b0:         b1:         b2:         b3:         b4:	b5:         b6:
> _cons       _cons       _cons       _cons       _cons    _cons       _cons
> y1   .84215046   .14613943   .00456665  -.00017402   .00006599  -1.640e-06
> -.00006325
>
>
> Now esttab produces a table like this
>
> b0
> _cons     .84215046
> b1
> _cons
> ......
>
>
> thinking that there are 12 (instead of six) parameters/rows. How can I
> work around this?
> I tried using the parameters option for nlsur but I get an error "not
> allowed".
>
> Many thanks,
>
> Thomas
> *
> *   For searches and help try:
> *   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
> *   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
> *   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
>
> *
> *   For searches and help try:
> *   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
> *   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
> *   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/