Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
st: RE: predicting survival with a semiparameteric model
From
"Martin Weiss" <[email protected]>
To
<[email protected]>
Subject
st: RE: predicting survival with a semiparameteric model
Date
Tue, 24 Aug 2010 19:29:25 +0200
<>
So your problem is pretty much the inverse of
http://www.stata.com/statalist/archive/2009-11/msg00132.html ?
HTH
Martin
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Feiveson, Alan H.
(JSC-SK311)
Sent: Dienstag, 24. August 2010 19:24
To: [email protected]
Subject: st: predicting survival with a semiparameteric model
Hi - I am estimating a semi-parametric survival model using -stcox-. In the
process, I can get estimates of the cumulated baseline hazard (say H0(t))
evaluated at values of time, t, in my data. Then I can use this to predict
the survival at time t for given values of the explanatory variables, say x,
using
S(t) = exp(-exp(xb)H0(t))
where xb is the linear predictor.
However, I don't see how to get a standard error of this prediction. For
example, -nlcom- only considers the estimation error in xb and treats H0(t)
as a known constant.
So is there a way to incorporate the uncertainty in estimating H0(t) into
the standard error of S(t)?
Of course, I can always get a standard error of S(t) with a fully parametric
model using -streg-, but if possible, I'd like to use a PH model without
having to specify a distribution.
Thanks
Al Feiveson
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/