Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
st: dealing with high dimensional fixed effects
From
statalist <[email protected]>
To
[email protected]
Subject
st: dealing with high dimensional fixed effects
Date
Sat, 21 Aug 2010 14:59:35 -0400
I am looking for suggestions for estimating LSDV/fixed effect models for which there are potentially large numbers of fixed effects.
I have a very large dataset, and estimating all these parameters, even after differencing out one set (areg/xtreg), is not possible on my UNIX system. All this being said, I am not really interested in the parameter estimates as much as controlling for unobserved heterogeneity.
Do people have suggestions for this? I know about the various two-way FE estimators (felsdvreg, a2reg, gpreg), but these are missing various features that I am interested in preserving (namely clustering and weighting). One could possibly cluster ("wild bootstrap") with these estimators, but weighting is not possible as far as I can tell.
Perhaps there is any easier way? I have not been able to reproduce estimates using a two-step, Frisch Waugh Lovell approach with weights, and I am wondering if I am missing something here...
xtreg y [aweight=weight], i(workerid) fe
predict y_res, ue
xtreg x [aweight=weight], i(workerid) fe
predict x_res, ue
xtreg y_res x_res [aweight=weight], i(firmid) fe cluster(group)
Any other suggestions for dealing with these types of (seemingly more and more common) issues?
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/