Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: st: Intraclass Correlation for an Independent Variable?
From
Steve Samuels <[email protected]>
To
[email protected]
Subject
Re: st: Intraclass Correlation for an Independent Variable?
Date
Wed, 11 Aug 2010 17:47:13 -0400
I didn't read the second part of your message closely enough. ICCs
can be computed for any variable measured in groups,and the reviewer's
terminology is impeccable. -loneway- should do what you want. But
"search intraclass, all" will find some extensions.
Steve
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 5:05 PM, Steve Samuels <[email protected]> wrote:
> The reviewer could well want to know if the plant differences in the X
> means are real. So, yes, he or she could really mean "X". This is
> the kind of question you'd test with a one-way ANOVA, or KW. You will
> need the data from the individual worker X measurements, or the
> plant-specific sample sizes and variances.
>
> Steve
> On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 4:36 PM, Lloyd Dumont <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Hello. I have gotten a confusing note from a reviewer, confusing in part because I think he/she is using the wrong terminology.
>>
>>
>> In a nutshell…
>>
>> I am running a cross-sectional time series model (on a dataset of plant-months) of a continuous variable Y measured at the plant level where the focal, continuous independent variable is X. X is also at the plant-level, but is time-constant. X is formed by taking the mean level of X from all of the individual workers in each plant.
>>
>> The reviewer suggests that I include some measure of within versus between plant variance in X. This would bolster the case that there is a genuine difference across plants rather than average differences simply reflecting noise. He/she then goes on to suggest I do this by reporting intraclass correlations (ICCs).
>>
>> As far as I understand it, ICCs (or rho) describe the variance in Y, not X. If I am right, then the reviewer did not mean ICC.
>>
>> Rather, he/she wants me to go back to the dataset of individuals (not plant-months) and wants me to run some simple analysis to show that there is clustering of values for X by clinic.
>>
>> Am I correctly understanding what the reviewer is asking for? And, if so, what is the simplest way to demonstrate the sort of dependence he/she is hoping to see?
>>
>> Thank you for your help. Lloyd
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> *
>> * For searches and help try:
>> * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
>> * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
>> * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Steven Samuels
> [email protected]
> 18 Cantine's Island
> Saugerties NY 12477
> USA
> Voice: 845-246-0774
> Fax: 206-202-4783
>
--
Steven Samuels
[email protected]
18 Cantine's Island
Saugerties NY 12477
USA
Voice: 845-246-0774
Fax: 206-202-4783
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/