Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
st: RE: RE: Re: statalist-digest V4 #3872
From
"Burak Darbaz" <[email protected]>
To
<[email protected]>
Subject
st: RE: RE: Re: statalist-digest V4 #3872
Date
Fri, 6 Aug 2010 18:32:37 +0100
Ignore the first part of the question, I made a typo when writing out
instruments, it works perfectly now, sorry.
The question on lincom is still valid though :)
Thanks
Burak Darbaz
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Burak Darbaz
Sent: 06 August 2010 18:26
To: [email protected]
Subject: st: RE: Re: statalist-digest V4 #3872
Dear Professor Baum,
Thanks a lot for the answer.
First, in the original specification (unrestricted), I get the following
coefficients
F.gnd = .5361618
L.gnd = .4614466
(they are all significant), so they already sum up to approximately one.
Then, when I try to restrict it by using the approach you have shown (D.gnd
on the left hand side and F.gnd-L.gnd on the right hand side), I get
a coefficient FLgnd = .4480393 (significant)
Isn't this a bit off? I mean, it drops from .53 to .44 even though the
unrestricted model's coefficients almost sum up to one.
Besides that, I couldn't manage to use lincom to get the coeff on L.gnd,
however, shouldnt 1-(FLgnd's coefficient) should be enough to get it?
Thanks a lot
Burak Darbaz
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Christopher Baum
Sent: 06 August 2010 15:36
To: [email protected]
Subject: st: Re: statalist-digest V4 #3872
<>
On Aug 6, 2010, at 2:33 AM, Burak wrote:
> I am trying to estimate an hybrid New Keynesian Phillips curve. Currently
I
> am using ivreg2 with the following command
>
> ivreg2 gnd dum11 dum22 dum33 L.gnd mc (F.gnd = L.gnd L2.gnd L3.gnd L4.gnd
> L.cpi L2.cpi L3.cpi L4.cpi L.rint L2.rint L3.rint L4.rint L.bpfilt
L2.bpfilt
> L3.bpfilt L4.bpfilt L.mc L2.mc L3.mc L4.mc), gmm2s robust bw(auto)
>
> what I want to do is to preimpose a restriction such that the coefficients
> of L.gnd and F.gnd sum up to one, and then estimate this. Is there a way
to
> do this?
ivreg2 D.gnd dum11 dum22 dum33 mc (FLgnd = L(1/4).gnd etc.
where FLgnd = F.gnd - L.gnd
Works the same way as imposing CRTS algebraically on a two-factor production
fn. The
coefficient on FLgnd is the coefficient of F.gnd in the original eqn. lincom
can calculate the
point and interval estimate of its complement (the coefficient of L.gnd in
the original eqn.)
Kit
Kit Baum | Boston College Economics & DIW Berlin |
http://ideas.repec.org/e/pba1.html
An Introduction to Stata Programming |
http://www.stata-press.com/books/isp.html
An Introduction to Modern Econometrics Using Stata |
http://www.stata-press.com/books/imeus.html
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/