Bookmark and Share

Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

st: RE: nlcom and delta method


From   "Dr. Martin Weiss" <[email protected]>
To   <[email protected]>
Subject   st: RE: nlcom and delta method
Date   Tue, 3 Aug 2010 18:50:17 +0200

<>

You have to -post- the result:

***********
sysuse auto, clear
reg price weight length trunk
nlcom (a: _b[weight]/_b[trunk]), post
di _b[a]
***********


HTH
Martin


-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Beatrice Crozza
Sent: Dienstag, 3. August 2010 18:35
To: statalist
Subject: st: nlcom and delta method

Dear All,

I did a maximum likelihood, using delta method, to get the values.

So, for example, one result of my maximum likelihood using delta
method is this one:


. nlcom (a: 1/(1+exp(-[ar]_b[_cons])))

          a:  1/(1+exp(-[ar]_b[_cons]))

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
             |      Coef.   Std. Err.      z    P>|z|     [95% Conf.
Interval]
-------------+--------------------------------------------------------------
--
          a |   .3697282   .0196595    18.81   0.000     .3311963
.4082601
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
--

Now I wan to test a no linear combinations, using the coefficient of a
, however the usual command for the coefficient: _b[a] doesn't work.

What can I do in this case?

Thanks.

Best,
Bea
*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/


© Copyright 1996–2018 StataCorp LLC   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   Site index