Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: st: heteroskedasticity test in panel data
From
"Michael N. Mitchell" <[email protected]>
To
[email protected]
Subject
Re: st: heteroskedasticity test in panel data
Date
Wed, 28 Jul 2010 10:23:04 -0700
Dear Kit
In that case, is the Stata FAQ (at http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/stat/panel.html)
on which this code example is based also backward? I summarize bits of it below...
. xtgls ... , igls panels(heteroskedastic)
. estimates store hetero
to fit the model with panel-level heteroskedasticity and save the likelihood.
We can fit the model without heteroskedasticity by typing
. xtgls ...
Now there is one trick. Normally, lrtest infers the number of constraints when we fit
nested models by looking at the number of parameters estimated. For xtgls, however, the
panel-level variances are estimated as nuisance parameters and their count is NOT included
in the parameters estimated. So, we will need to tell lrtest how many constraints we have
implied.
The number of panels/groups is stored in e(N_g) and, in the second model, we are
constraining all of these to be single value, so our number of constraints can be computed
and stored in a local macro by typing
. local df = e(N_g) - 1
The test is then obtained by typing
. lrtest hetero . , df(`df')
Thanks!
Michael N. Mitchell
Data Management Using Stata - http://www.stata.com/bookstore/dmus.html
A Visual Guide to Stata Graphics - http://www.stata.com/bookstore/vgsg.html
Stata tidbit of the week - http://www.MichaelNormanMitchell.com
On 2010-07-28 6.24 AM, Christopher Baum wrote:
<>
On Jul 28, 2010, at 2:33 AM, Jing wrote:
. lrtest hetero ., df(620)
Likelihood-ratio test LR chi2(620)= -6436.22
(Assumption: hetero nested in .) Prob> chi2 = 1.0000
Backwards! Homo is a special case of hetero, which explains why you're getting a NEGATIVE Chi-square value. You have to
give the arguments to lrtest in the right order.
A positive Chi-square of 6400 with a large df has a p-value of zero, not one.
Kit
Kit Baum | Boston College Economics& DIW Berlin | http://ideas.repec.org/e/pba1.html
An Introduction to Stata Programming | http://www.stata-press.com/books/isp.html
An Introduction to Modern Econometrics Using Stata | http://www.stata-press.com/books/imeus.html
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/