Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: st: heteroskedasticity test in panel data
From
"Michael N. Mitchell" <[email protected]>
To
[email protected]
Subject
Re: st: heteroskedasticity test in panel data
Date
Mon, 26 Jul 2010 22:24:52 -0700
Dear Jing
Based on your example, it looks like you could do this...
. xtgls..., igls panels (heteroskedastic)
. estimates store hetero
. xtgls...
. display e(N_g)-1
The last command will show, I believe, the number of groups minus 1. It looks like your
example uses this for the degrees of freedom. Say that number was 157. You could then type
. lrtest hetero ., df (157)
and it looks like it would use 157 as the df. I am out of my element here, so I trust
that someone else will correct me if I am off base. But I hope this helps.
Michael N. Mitchell
Data Management Using Stata - http://www.stata.com/bookstore/dmus.html
A Visual Guide to Stata Graphics - http://www.stata.com/bookstore/vgsg.html
Stata tidbit of the week - http://www.MichaelNormanMitchell.com
On 2010-07-26 9.58 PM, Jing Zhou wrote:
thank you Michael, for the command "lrtest hetero ., df ('df')", how can i get the value of df?
Jing
"Michael N. Mitchell"<[email protected]> 27/07/2010 2:23 pm>>>
Greetings
I wonder if this would help...
. set matsize 800
(or select another number in place of 800).
Hope that helps,
Michael N. Mitchell
Data Management Using Stata - http://www.stata.com/bookstore/dmus.html
A Visual Guide to Stata Graphics - http://www.stata.com/bookstore/vgsg.html
Stata tidbit of the week - http://www.MichaelNormanMitchell.com
On 2010-07-26 7.57 PM, Jing Zhou wrote:
Dear All,
I am going to test the heteroskedasticity in my panel data. by using the recommended commands on FAQ which are specified as:
xtgls..., igls panels (heteroskedastic)
estimates store hetero
xtgls...
local df=e (N_g)-1
lrtest hetero., df ('df')
the result shows wrong information as "matsize too small - should be at least 621". Could you please advise me what is the potential cause to this problem? and how can i refine it?
Many thanks!
Jing
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/