Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
st: RE: AW: RE: AW: AW: Creating a Group Pair ID (where the generating variables order shouldn't matter)
From
"Nick Cox" <[email protected]>
To
<[email protected]>
Subject
st: RE: AW: RE: AW: AW: Creating a Group Pair ID (where the generating variables order shouldn't matter)
Date
Fri, 23 Jul 2010 13:30:16 +0100
Good question.
Your identifier would lead to an integer variable with labels if -group()- were used with the -label- option. A good identifier should be informative as well as distinct, so I regard using -label- as very good practice. I didn't spot that you weren't following that very good practice. My mistake.
Nick
[email protected]
Martin Weiss
" Which could in turn be made simpler:"
Though the two approaches hardly lead to the same result. My notion of an
"ID", as originally requested, would not be a string such as "England
France", but a numeric variable running from 1 to N, with N the number of
distinct groups.
*************
clear*
inp str20 c1id str20 c2id
"US" "Canada"
"US" "Mexico"
"Canada" "US"
"US" "France"
"France" "England"
"France" "US"
end
gen newid = cond(c1id < c2id, c1id, c2id) /*
*/ + " " + cond(c2id < c1id, c1id, c2id)
sort newid
l, sepby(newid) noo
*************
What makes you think that my approach returns a " ...integer variable with
labels."? All I can find is a -varlabel- attached to my newid.
. d newid
storage display value
variable name type format label variable label
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------
newid float %9.0g group(first second)
HTH
Martin
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] Im Auftrag von Nick Cox
Gesendet: Freitag, 23. Juli 2010 13:59
An: [email protected]
Betreff: st: RE: AW: AW: Creating a Group Pair ID (where the generating
variables order shouldn't matter)
Which could in turn be made simpler:
gen first = cond(c1id < c2id, c1id, c2id)
gen second = cond(c2id < c1id, c1id, c2id)
egen newid = group(first second)
drop first second
sort newid
could become
gen newid = cond(c1id < c2id, c1id, c2id) + " " + cond(c2id < c1id,
c1id, c2id)
sort newid
The cost is greater storage, which may or may not bite: that is, -newid-
is a string variable rather than an integer variable with labels. But if
you have enough space to create -first- and -second- as string
variables, even fleetingly, you presumably have enough space for a
string -newid-.
Nick
[email protected]
Martin Weiss
Essentially, the technique advocated in NJC`s tip boils down to a simple
trick:
*************
clear*
inp str20 c1id str20 c2id
"US" "Canada"
"US" "Mexico"
"Canada" "US"
"US" "France"
"France" "England"
"France" "US"
end
gen first = cond(c1id < c2id, c1id, c2id)
gen second = cond(c2id < c1id, c1id, c2id)
egen newid = group(first second)
drop first second
sort newid
l, sepby(newid) noo
*************
Martin Weiss
Try NJC`s http://www.stata-journal.com/article.html?article=dm0043
J Taylor
I am trying to create an ID corresponding to numbers from two lists.
For example, if the two lists were of countries, one would have
clear
input str20 c1id str20 c2id
"US" "Canada"
"US" "Mexico"
"Canada" "US"
"US" "France"
"France" "England"
"France" "US"
end
egen newid = group(c1id c2id)
I would like newid to create an ID pair for each country pair. My
first instinct was to use the egen group command. However, the
problem is that egen group takes into account which id comes first.
For example, (c1id,c2id)=(United States,Canada) and (c1id,c2id)=(
Canada ,United States) have different IDs. I would like them to be
able to have the same ID. That is, I would like to create newid as a
group pair ID, reflecting which two countries are in the pair, and
where the order doesn't matter.
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/