Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
From | "Martin Weiss" <martin.weiss1@gmx.de> |
To | <statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu> |
Subject | st: AW: Re: AW: treatment effect estimation with an ordinal 1st step and a continuous 2nd step |
Date | Sat, 17 Jul 2010 22:40:47 +0200 |
<> " However, the following syntax xi: cmp (y1 = x1) (y2 = x2 y1), ind(5 1)" What is -xi- good for in your -cmp- call, btw? HTH Martin -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: owner-statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu [mailto:owner-statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu] Im Auftrag von ??? Gesendet: Samstag, 17. Juli 2010 22:17 An: "Martin Weiss" Cc: statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu Betreff: st: Re: AW: treatment effect estimation with an ordinal 1st step and a continuous 2nd step Dear Martin, Thanks for your comment. It was helpful. However, the following syntax xi: cmp (y1 = x1) (y2 = x2 y1), ind(5 1) where y1 = ordinal numbers like 1, 2, 3, 4 y2 = continuous gives an error sign like "matrix___00000B not found" And the program shows (y1 = x1) result only, which is exactly identical to the outcome from an (oprobit y1 x1) regression. Thanks in advance. Jaemin ----- Original Message ----- From: "Martin Weiss" <martin.weiss1@gmx.de> To: <statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu> Sent: Saturday, July 17, 2010 10:45 PM Subject: st: AW: treatment effect estimation with an ordinal 1st step and a continuous 2nd step > > <> > > Try > > ************* > ssc d cmp > ************* > > > > HTH > Martin > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > Von: owner-statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu > [mailto:owner-statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu] Im Auftrag von ??? > Gesendet: Samstag, 17. Juli 2010 15:29 > An: statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu > Betreff: st: treatment effect estimation with an ordinal 1st step and a > continuous 2nd step > > Hi all! > > I want to run a treatment effects model. > > In my case, the 1st step dependent var. is ordinal (for exmaple, > "perfectly > not matched", "not matched", "matched", and "perfectly matched"), and the > 2nd step dependent var. is continuous (for example, wage in log). > I have run the similar model using "treatreg" command if the 1st step > depednat is binary. > > Is there any command working in this case. > > I found "mtreatreg" is available if > (1) 1st step dependent var. is multivariate and > (2) 2nd step DV is continuous > > Of course, 1st step ordinal treatment variable should be shown in the 2nd > step equation as an independent variable explicitly. > > P.S.: I don't think running "oprobit" as the 1st step, and insertting IMR > from it as independent variable into the 2nd step OLS regression is valid. > > Thanks, > jaemin > > * > * For searches and help try: > * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search > * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq > * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/ > > > * > * For searches and help try: > * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search > * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq > * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/ > > * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/ * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/