Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
From | Maarten buis <maartenbuis@yahoo.co.uk> |
To | statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu |
Subject | Re: st: duration analysis in gllamm |
Date | Tue, 13 Jul 2010 06:02:30 +0000 (GMT) |
--- On Mon, 12/7/10, Melaku Fekadu wrote: > so you are advicing me to rely on only the parametrical > one? No, I am advising you to check whether your unobserved variable shows the behaviour I described when you use the non-parametric one. Probably the easiest way is to simulate the unobserved variable and observe the distribution of the survivors over time. Moreover, that pattern seems less likely to occur when you use more mass points, so adding a mass point would be a straightforward sollution when you encounter this problem. Hope this helps, Maarten -------------------------- Maarten L. Buis Institut fuer Soziologie Universitaet Tuebingen Wilhelmstrasse 36 72074 Tuebingen Germany http://www.maartenbuis.nl -------------------------- * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/