Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: st: Is -collapse- the Stata's fastest routine to summarize data sets?
From
Eric Booth <[email protected]>
To
"<[email protected]>" <[email protected]>
Subject
Re: st: Is -collapse- the Stata's fastest routine to summarize data sets?
Date
Fri, 9 Jul 2010 00:36:36 +0000
<>
Tiago:
When summarizing a large dataset, I've found the program that runs the fastest for me is -tabout- (from SSC).
I don't know enough about what's going on in the tabout adofile to know why it's faster and it may not be faster for all types of summary tables, but I when I changed from -collapse-/-contract- to -tabout- in my do-file there was a huge time savings when working with a dataset of about 60 million obs.
For an illustration, here's a speed comparison for creating the same summary table with these 2 packages:
******************!
clear all
** | change -set mem- and -expand- below to fit your system | **
set mem 12g
sysuse auto
cap which tabout
if _rc ssc install tabout
**create a large dataset**
expand 950000
desc, sh
recode rep78 (.=9)
**test collapse vs. tabout**
// 1. collapse
ds make rep78, not
local vars `r(varlist)'
**
timer clear 1
timer on 1
collapse (sum) `vars' , by(rep78)
timer off 1
save master
// 2. tabout
local vars: subinstr local vars " " " sum ", all
di "`vars'"
**
timer clear 2
timer on 2
tabout rep78 using test.xls, replace sum c(sum `vars')
timer off 2
**make sure these are creating the same summary tables**
cf _all using master.dta, verbose all
**
timer list
******************!
/*
timer list
1: 240.41 / 1 = 240.4130
2: 0.43 / 1 = 0.4340
*/
4 minutes for -collapse- versus less than a second for -tabout- summary table (using Stata 11.1 MP on Mac OS X).
Good luck.
~ Eric
__
Eric A. Booth
Public Policy Research Institute
Texas A&M University
[email protected]
Office: +979.845.6754
On Jul 8, 2010, at 9:02 AM, Tiago V. Pereira wrote:
> Dear Statalister,
>
> I am eager to know any faster alternatives to -collapse-, because I have
> to summarize relatively large data sets for a simulation study. -profiler-
> is telling me that most of the computation burden comes from -collapse-.
> Do you know (have) any faster alternative? Perhaps a plug-in?
>
> Thanks!
>
> Tiago
>
> *
> * For searches and help try:
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/