Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: st: glm executes very very slow
From
"G. Dai" <[email protected]>
To
[email protected]
Subject
Re: st: glm executes very very slow
Date
Wed, 7 Jul 2010 11:11:10 -0700
maybe. The r`i'cenreg only take values with 1, 2, 3,4 , and 5.
On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 11:03 AM, Nick Cox <[email protected]> wrote:
> I very much doubt the idea of a bug in -glm-. The point is that your syntax change is not at all trivial: it could mean many fewer parameters to estimate. Otherwise put, the issue is almost certainly the difficulty of fitting your model, rather than the size of the dataset or any problem in Stata.
>
> Nick
> [email protected]
>
> G. Dai
>
> For reference only, if i replace i.r`i'cenreg with r`i'cenreg, the
> glm command runs through. but I don't know why. Maybe a bug with glm?
>
> On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 10:17 AM, G. Dai <[email protected]> wrote:
>> FYI, the dataset is about 50m with obs about 4000.
>>
>> On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 9:03 AM, G. Dai <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> hi all,
>>> I guess it might be useful to open a new thread for my problem.
>>>
>>> I'm using glm command to estimate a fraction probit model.
>>> however, when the do file goes to the following glm estimation,
>>> it becomes very very slow. actually, it took me hours to finish the estimation.
>>>
>>> I tried it on STATA SE 11.1 in a MAC and on STATA MP 11.0 in the department
>>> server.
>>>
>>> any help is appreciated.
>>>
>>> Guang
>>>
>>> ************************excerpt begins******************
>>> svy: glm r`i'pin r`i'`x'nhu /*parental NH stay experience*/
>>> h`i'itot h`i'atotf /*income and financial wealth*/
>>> r`i'conde r`i'adlsa r`i'iadlsa /*health condition and status*/
>>> r`i'nrshom /*past NH experience*/
>>> raedyrs r`i'agey_b ragender /*identity*/
>>> h`i'child r`i'hiltc /*health insurance and children*/
>>> i.r`i'cenreg,fam(bi 1) link(probit);
>>> ***********************excerpt ends*****************
>>> Note, where r`i'pin is the fractional variable ranges from 0 to
>>> 1,which massive point at 0.
>
> *
> * For searches and help try:
> * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
> * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
> * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
>
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/