Bookmark and Share

Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

st: fixed vs random effect model


From   amatoallah ouchen <[email protected]>
To   [email protected]
Subject   st: fixed vs random effect model
Date   Sun, 4 Jul 2010 16:42:30 +0200

Good day Stata-listers,
I'm apoloziging is the question may seems elementary for many of you,
but i really need to check this before going on in my analysis. i'm
running a panel data regression and after performing the haussman test
the conclusion was that my model is a fixed effect one. The problem is
located on my explanatory variables which display week variations, and
as it is well known fixed effect model gives weak results in a such
case. So should 'i use the random effect instead???

Thanks a lot in advance.

Ama.
*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/


© Copyright 1996–2018 StataCorp LLC   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   Site index