Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
st: fixed vs random effect model
From
amatoallah ouchen <[email protected]>
To
[email protected]
Subject
st: fixed vs random effect model
Date
Sun, 4 Jul 2010 16:42:30 +0200
Good day Stata-listers,
I'm apoloziging is the question may seems elementary for many of you,
but i really need to check this before going on in my analysis. i'm
running a panel data regression and after performing the haussman test
the conclusion was that my model is a fixed effect one. The problem is
located on my explanatory variables which display week variations, and
as it is well known fixed effect model gives weak results in a such
case. So should 'i use the random effect instead???
Thanks a lot in advance.
Ama.
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/