Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: st: Non-normal alternative to MANOVA?
From
Steve Samuels <[email protected]>
To
[email protected]
Subject
Re: st: Non-normal alternative to MANOVA?
Date
Fri, 2 Jul 2010 11:18:08 -0400
Steve
On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 9:44 AM, <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi all,
> I have been asked to analyse a small dataset from a randomized controlled trial,
> with 24 subjects (12 in each group, control and intervention). There are 3 sets
> of continuous outcome measures (b1, b2, b3) taken at baseline, 7 weeks and 3
> months, and 2 variables which need to be controlled for - level of impairment
> impair (binary) and number of interventions numint (continuous integer).
>
> If the data were normal I would have done something like this:
>
> manova b1 b2 b3=group impair numint, continuous(numint)
>
> and then do various manova tests.
>
> Unfortunately the outcome data b1-3 are highly skewed, so I can't use manova.
> What would be a good alternative?
>
> Thanks.
>
> *
> * For searches and help try:
> * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
> * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
> * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
>
--
Steven Samuels
[email protected]
18 Cantine's Island
Saugerties NY 12477
USA
Voice: 845-246-0774
Fax: 206-202-4783
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/