Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: st: All coefficients significant
From
"Michael I. Lichter" <[email protected]>
To
[email protected]
Subject
Re: st: All coefficients significant
Date
Wed, 23 Jun 2010 13:59:13 -0400
Rosie,
If you have a very large sample size, you may get results that are
statistically significant despite being of little practical
significance. If you are erroneously using very large f-weights, you
could get the same result. For a better answer than that, you will have
to supply more information. Show us your regression results and provide
a little background about the variables and why you think it
substantively unlikely that all of the coefficients would be significant.
Michael
Rosie Chen wrote:
Does anyone know what could have gone wrong with the following situation? A regression analysis produced the coefficients that are statistically significant at .001 level. This is unusual to me. What could have caused such a problem? Many thanks for any advice.
Rosie
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
--
Michael I. Lichter, Ph.D. <[email protected]>
Research Assistant Professor & NRSA Fellow
UB Department of Family Medicine / Primary Care Research Institute
UB Clinical Center, 462 Grider Street, Buffalo, NY 14215
Office: CC 126 / Phone: 716-898-4751 / FAX: 716-898-3536
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/