Re: st: All coefficients significant

["Michael I. Lichter" <mlichter@buffalo.edu>]

Rosie,

If you have a very large sample size, you may get results that are 
statistically significant despite being of little practical 
significance. If you are erroneously using very large f-weights, you 
could get the same result. For a better answer than that, you will have 
to supply more information. Show us your regression results and provide 
a little background about the variables and why you think it 
substantively unlikely that all of the coefficients would be significant.
Michael

Rosie Chen wrote:
> Does anyone know what could have gone wrong with the following situation? A regression analysis produced the coefficients that are statistically significant at .001 level. This is unusual to me.  What could have caused such a problem? Many thanks for any advice. 
>
> Rosie
>
>
>
>       
> *
> *   For searches and help try:
> *   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
> *   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
> *   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
>   
--
Michael I. Lichter, Ph.D. <mlichter@buffalo.edu>
Research Assistant Professor & NRSA Fellow
UB Department of Family Medicine / Primary Care Research Institute
UB Clinical Center, 462 Grider Street, Buffalo, NY 14215
Office: CC 126 / Phone: 716-898-4751 / FAX: 716-898-3536

*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/