Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: st: negative binomial model
From
Clive Nicholas <[email protected]>
To
[email protected]
Subject
Re: st: negative binomial model
Date
Sun, 20 Jun 2010 21:58:01 +0100
Mareike Hahr replied to Maarten Buis:
> Now that I tried to run both the Poisson model with fixed and random
> effects, with the RE specification actually the same problem occurred again.
> This probably implies that there is really no other choice but to dropp some
> of the explanatory variables?!?
Quite frankly, if you've managed to come to this conclusion all by
yourself, based on your own data that neither Maarten nor anybody else
can see, then why on Earth are you asking any of us?
--
Clive Nicholas
[Please DO NOT mail me personally here, but at
<[email protected]>. Please respond to contributions I make in
a list thread here. Thanks!]
"My colleagues in the social sciences talk a great deal about
methodology. I prefer to call it style." -- Freeman J. Dyson.
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/