Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: st: How to make a code faster - alternatives to egen var = concat(vars) ?,
From
Antoine Terracol <[email protected]>
To
[email protected]
Subject
Re: st: How to make a code faster - alternatives to egen var = concat(vars) ?,
Date
Thu, 17 Jun 2010 22:04:43 +0200
Tiago,
You would have to define a -byable- -program-, such as:
capture program drop mymean
program define mymean, byable(recall)
syntax varname
marksample touse
su `varlist' if `touse'
local a= _byindex()
scalar mean`a'=r(mean)
end
sysuse auto, clear
bysort foreign rep78 : mymean price
scalar dir
Antoine
On 17/06/2010 15:47, Tiago V. Pereira wrote:
Thanks, Antoine!
But for each combinations, I want to save a local containing the r(mean).
Is it possible to do that using -bysort-?
Tiago
---------------
Dear statalisters,
I am working on a stata code, and I need some advice.
I have n categorical variables that assumes values equal to 0, 1 or 2. My
objective is to summarize a continuous variable (say, age) by all possible
combinations of these categorical variables.
For example, suppose I have 5 categorical variables (x1, x2, x3, x4 and x5):
sum age if x1==0&x2==0&x3==0&x4==0&x5==0
then
sum age if x1==0&x2==0&x3==0&x4==0&x5==1
then
sum age if x1==0&x2==0&x3==0&x4==0&x5==2
and so forth.
What I am doing is the following: (1) I generate a string of the
categorical variables
egen combination = concat(x1 x2 x3 x4 x5)
(2) convert them to numeric
encode combination, gene (y)
and loop over the values of the new variable y to summarize the continuous
variable
forvalues i = 1/`some_max_value' {
sum age if y=`i'
}
This naïve solution works very well for small samples (_N<1000) and small
number of categorical variables (5 to 7). But when I need investigate in a
larger sample with a larger number of categorical variables, this code is
highly inefficient (e.g. slow).
Do you have any suggestions to make this procedure faster in larger data
sets?
Thanks in advance!
Tiago
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/