Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: st: missing data?
From
Maarten buis <[email protected]>
To
[email protected]
Subject
Re: st: missing data?
Date
Thu, 17 Jun 2010 06:55:29 -0700 (PDT)
--- On Thu, 17/6/10, Sabrina Carrossa wrote:
> On the one hand I would use the second Db (B) because it is
> the only one that allow me to use the regional information in the
> longitudinal database (while in the Db A I have the regional
> information only in the cross-sectional one).
>
> On the other hand, I would like to be able to differentiate
> those that have not a specific good because they can't affort it from
> those that haven't a specific good for other reason.
>
> Do you think that appending the two Db (A and B) I can
> estimate these values for the Db B such as in a missing data case?
Yes, if you need a reference: Andrew Gelman; Gary King; Chuanhai Liu
(1998) "Not Asked and Not Answered: Multiple Imputation for Multiple
Surveys" Journal of the American Statistical Association, 93(443):
846-857.
Hope this helps,
Maarten
--------------------------
Maarten L. Buis
Institut fuer Soziologie
Universitaet Tuebingen
Wilhelmstrasse 36
72074 Tuebingen
Germany
http://www.maartenbuis.nl
--------------------------
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/