Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
st: Re: bootstrap test, combined bootstrap datasets, statistical properties of the bootstrap
From
gcafiso <[email protected]>
To
[email protected]
Subject
st: Re: bootstrap test, combined bootstrap datasets, statistical properties of the bootstrap
Date
Tue, 8 Jun 2010 07:57:58 -0700 (PDT)
Dear Stas,
sorry for this very late answer, but the e-mail server which I use for
statalist stopped working for a while.
My doubt regards which Critical Values I should use to test Ho:'df_L >0'.
Where:
1- df_Lb = df_TFb * df_GCb;
2- the distribution of df_L is generated as the product of the bootstrap
distribution of df_TF times the bootstrap distribution of df_GC.
If I want to test this hypothesis for either df_TF or df_GC, the ‘Bias
–Corrected and Accelerated Confidence Interval’ (BCa-CI) is reliable when
the bootstrap distribution is not normal. Then, if the upper-limit of the
BCa-CI (95% quantile) were less than 0, I would reject Ho: df_TF>0 (or
df_GC).
I wonder whether I can use the BCa-CI even for df_L. I am not sure about
this since its distribution is not generated in a bootstrap process, but it
is the ex-post product of two different bootstrap distributions. I am
worried about the robustness of the BCa-CI with respect to this case.
Furthermore, I am not sure that I am able to use the BCa-CI to test the
hypothesis. Indeed, I do not believe that the acceleration for df_L is given
by the product of the accelerations of df_TF and df_GC.
______________
As for the points that you listed in your reply:
1 &2 – Strictly speaking, I am not dealing with time series. ‘diff’ is to
test the difference between the same population taken at two different
times.
3 – Yes, I do not have a point null. But why should this be problematic? Is
the percentile method or the BCa-CI for hypothesis testing restricted to the
case of a point null? I didn’t find anything about this in the literature.
My null refers to zero and I check how the bootstrap distribution is
positioned with respect to zero. I do not understand why you mention an
asymptotic test. As far as I know, the all point of the bootstrap is to
exploit the bootstrap distribution without resort to asymptotic theory.
However, I am not a statistician. Let me know if I am missing something.
These considerations are drawn from Cameron + Trivedi 2005
–‘Microeconometrics’, paragraph 11.2.6, 11.2.7.
Many thanks.
Gianluca
--
View this message in context: http://statalist.1588530.n2.nabble.com/bootstrap-test-combined-bootstrap-datasets-statistical-properties-of-the-bootstrap-tp5002239p5153758.html
Sent from the Statalist mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/