Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
st: RE: Quantile regression runtimes
From
"Martin Weiss" <[email protected]>
To
<[email protected]>
Subject
st: RE: Quantile regression runtimes
Date
Sat, 5 Jun 2010 21:28:37 +0200
<>
" on a very
large dataset (the Census' 2008 American Community Survey 1% samples)."
How large is the dataset exactly, Jacob? Remember, you cannot presume every
listmember is familiar with this dataset, even though in your profession it
may well be famous...
HTH
Martin
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Jacob Felson
Sent: Samstag, 5. Juni 2010 21:04
To: [email protected]
Subject: st: Quantile regression runtimes
I'm curious about the runtimes for quantile regression. I am running
decile regressions (.1, .2, .3, .4, .5, .6, .7, .8, and .9) on a very
large dataset (the Census' 2008 American Community Survey 1% samples).
Runtimes generally decrease as deciles increase:
Runtimes are in minutes
.1 74.27413
.2 34.95253
.3 13.1072
.4 8.738133
.5 8.738133
.6 4.369067
.7 6.5536
.8 8.738133
I'm very curious -- why is the runtime for .1 regression so much
higher than for .2? And what might explain the general pattern of
these runtimes?
Thanks,
Jacob Felson
Assistant Professor
Department of Sociology
William Paterson University
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/